=?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de> writes:
> No review, but apparently "uniquify" is more widely accepted than
> "uniqueify".
Personally I'd write "unique-ify", seeing that neither of the forms
without the dash are considered good English. Of course, if you
need to make identifiers out of this, that solution doesn't work;
but you could just avoid the construction --- say, "make_path_unique"
rather than "uniquify_path".
regards, tom lane