Re: Refactoring of command.c
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Refactoring of command.c |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3382.1014836797@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Refactoring of command.c ("Rod Taylor" <rbt@zort.ca>) |
| Ответы |
Arch (was RE: Refactoring of command.c )
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Rod Taylor" <rbt@zort.ca> writes:
> Dug the below out of googles cache -- it's what the BSDs do for moving
> files in cvs.
> What is a repo-copy?
> A repo-copy (which is a short form of ``repository copy'') refers to
> the direct copying of files within the CVS repository.
Yeah, I think that's what we discussed the last time the question came
up.
It seems awfully wrongheaded to me. IMHO, the entire point of a CVS
repository is to store past states of your software, not only the
current state. Destroying the accurate representation of your historical
releases is a poor tradeoff for making it a little easier to find the
log entries for code that's been moved around. What's the point
of having history, if it's not accurate?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: