Re: Should we add debug_parallel_query=regress to CI?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Should we add debug_parallel_query=regress to CI? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 334945.1741198200@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Should we add debug_parallel_query=regress to CI? (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Should we add debug_parallel_query=regress to CI?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2025-03-05 12:29:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think this does need to be documented somewhere/somehow, just so
>> that people don't waste time focusing on "it's failing on FreeBSD"
>> when the actual cause is some other thing we happened to load
>> onto that task.
> 0002 is a first draft for one way to do this.
Works for me.
> Of course this still requires somebody analyzing a failure to look at
> cirrus.tasks.yml, but I don't know if we can do a whole lot about that?
If it's far away from the actual task-spec code it probably won't
get maintained very well, so putting it here seems OK to me.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: