Re: Fix misaligned access of ItemPointerData on ARM
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Fix misaligned access of ItemPointerData on ARM |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3345.1432241367@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Fix misaligned access of ItemPointerData on ARM (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Fix misaligned access of ItemPointerData on ARM
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 05/21/2015 04:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I wonder whether we should drop the ARM assumption and instead write
>>
>> #if defined(pg_attribute_packed) && defined(pg_attribute_aligned)
>> pg_attribute_packed()
>> pg_attribute_aligned(2)
>> #endif
>>
>> so that the annotations are applied on every compiler that accepts them.
> Sounds reasonable.
We can try it and see if the buildfarm blows up, at least.
I considered also adding a Static_assert about sizeof(ItemIdData),
but I'm afraid that compilers that don't support these pragmas
probably don't support Static_assert either, so it's not clear
that that would catch anything.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: