Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC
Дата
Msg-id 3317.1120710284@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC  (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>)
Ответы Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to> writes:
> Are you sure about that? That would probably be the normal case, but are
> you promised that the hardware will write all of the sectors of a block
> in order?

I don't think you can possibly assume that.  If the block crosses a
cylinder boundary then it's certainly an unsafe assumption, and even
within a cylinder (no seek required) I'm pretty sure that disk drives
have understood "write the next sector that passes under the heads"
for decades.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruno Wolff III
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC