Tom, that layout is a PNG graphic, of course it doesn't scale ;-)
But this design (done right, which I suspect Omar & Emily of doing)
could easily collapse 200 pixels to drop to a minimum 800 pixels wide.
To me this is a non issue.
And if you've got a big monitor, then use it! Why pretend to surf on
a Palm Pilot?
-- Mitch
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:47:40 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > Ned Lilly wrote:
> >> I like it too, very much. Only question is, how does the design scale
> >> to 800x600, which should probably still be the minimum?
>
> > I seriously doubt anyone trying to use PostgreSQL is stuck at 800x600.
> > 1024x768 is probably good enough. It does fix in 1024x768 btw :)
>
> One thing that annoys the heck out of me is webpage designers who think
> I should use a full-screen window to look at their pages. Yes, I have
> a large monitor; no, you can't have it all.
>
> If the design doesn't adapt to a smaller window reasonably gracefully,
> it's broken.
>
> In this case, about all I could see without scrolling right was the
> content-free logo and picture ... so I wasn't real impressed.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
>