Re: libpq stricter integer parsing

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: libpq stricter integer parsing
Дата
Msg-id 32c5acc4-94ad-eeb4-5295-d52f25896079@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: libpq stricter integer parsing  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: libpq stricter integer parsing  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 11/09/2018 11:00, Michael Paquier wrote:
> diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/libpq.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/libpq.sgml
> index 5e7931ba90..bc7836d103 100644
> --- a/doc/src/sgml/libpq.sgml
> +++ b/doc/src/sgml/libpq.sgml
> @@ -1591,6 +1591,15 @@ postgresql://%2Fvar%2Flib%2Fpostgresql/dbname
>      </varlistentry>
>      </variablelist>
>     </para>
> +
> +   <para>
> +    Integer values expected for keywords <literal>port</literal>,
> +    <literal>connect_timeout</literal>, <literal>keepalives_idle</literal>,
> +    <literal>keepalives_interval</literal> and
> +    <literal>keepalives_timeout</literal> are parsed more strictly as
> +    of <product>PostgreSQL<product> 12, i.e. values including trailing garbage
> +    or overflowing are rejected.
> +   </para>
>    </sect2>
>   </sect1>

I would leave this out.  We don't need to document every single
refinement of parsing rules.  This might better belong in the release notes.

> +    appendPQExpBuffer(&conn->errorMessage,
> +                      libpq_gettext("invalid value for keyword \"%s\"\n"),
> +                      context);

Add the actual invalid value to the error message.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: StandbyAcquireAccessExclusiveLock doesn't necessarily
Следующее
От: David Fetter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: CREATE ROUTINE MAPPING