Re: Cube extension kNN support
| От | Stas Kelvich |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Cube extension kNN support |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 32A833C3-9690-45CA-92AB-A16858F8A98A@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Cube extension kNN support (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Cube extension kNN support
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, thanks for the review.
> 1) (nitpicking) There seem to be some minor whitespace issues, i.e.
> trailing spaces, empty lines being added/removed, etc.
Fixed, I think
> 2) one of the regression tests started to fail
>
> SELECT '-1e-700'::cube AS cube;
>
> This used to return (0) but now I get (-0).
Actually that problem emerged because of the first problem. I had extra whitespace in sql file and removed that
whitespacefrom one of the answers file (cube_1.sql), so diff with both cube.sql and cube_1.sql was one line length and
yousaw diff with cube.sql.
In all systems that available to me (osx/linux/freebsd) I saw that right answers file is cube_1.sql. But in other OS’es
youcan get +/- 0 or e27/e027. I edited that answers files manually, so there probably can be some other typos.
> 3) I wonder why the docs were changed like this:
>
> <para>
> - It does not matter which order the opposite corners of a cube are
> - entered in. The <type>cube</> functions
> - automatically swap values if needed to create a uniform
> - <quote>lower left — upper right</> internal representation.
> + When corners coincide cube stores only one corner along with a
> special flag in order to reduce size wasted.
> </para>
>
> Was the old behavior removed? I don't think so - it seems to behave
> as before, so why to remove this information? Maybe it's not useful?
> But then why add the bit about optimizing storage of points?
I’ve edited it because the statement was mislead (or at least ambiguous) — cube_in function doesn’t swap coordinates.
Simple way to see it:
> select '(1,3),(3,1)'::cube;
cube
---------------
(1, 3),(3, 1)
But LowerLeft-UpperRight representation should be (1,1),(3,3)
Updated patch attached.
> On 15 Dec 2015, at 21:46, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 12/07/2015 03:47 PM, Stas Kelvich wrote:
>> Hello, fixed.
>
> I've looked at the patch today, seems mostly fine to me.
>
> Three comments though:
>
> 1) (nitpicking) There seem to be some minor whitespace issues, i.e.
> trailing spaces, empty lines being added/removed, etc.
>
> 2) one of the regression tests started to fail
>
> SELECT '-1e-700'::cube AS cube;
>
> This used to return (0) but now I get (-0). As this query existed in
> 1.0, it's probably due to change in the C code. Now sure where.
>
> 3) I wonder why the docs were changed like this:
>
> <para>
> - It does not matter which order the opposite corners of a cube are
> - entered in. The <type>cube</> functions
> - automatically swap values if needed to create a uniform
> - <quote>lower left — upper right</> internal representation.
> + When corners coincide cube stores only one corner along with a
> special flag in order to reduce size wasted.
> </para>
>
> Was the old behavior removed? I don't think so - it seems to behave
> as before, so why to remove this information? Maybe it's not useful?
> But then why add the bit about optimizing storage of points?
>
> regards
>
> --
> Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: