Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues

Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> We've been talking about this magical "proper module facility" for a few 
> releases now... are we still opposed to putting contrib modules in thier own 
> schema?

I'm hesitant to do that when we don't yet have either a design or a
migration plan for the module facility.  We might find we'd shot
ourselves in the foot, or at least complicated the migration situation
unduly.
        regards, tom lane