Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start
Дата
Msg-id 3286.1492642586@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start
Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start
Список pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hm.  Do you have a more-portable alternative?

> I was thinking in a WaitEventSet from latch.c.

Yeah, some googling turns up the suggestion that a self-pipe is a portable
way to get consistent semantics from select(); latch.c has already done
that.  I suppose that using latch.c would be convenient in that we'd have
to write little new code, but it's a tad annoying to add the overhead of a
self-pipe on platforms where we don't need it (which seems to be most).
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Highly Variable Planning Times