>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:scrappy@postgresql.org]
>> Sent: 20 January 2005 01:24
>> To: Joshua D. Drake
>> Cc: Dave Page; Marc G. Fournier; Magnus Hagander;
>> fred@redhotpenguin.com; josh@agliodbs.com; pgsql-www@postgresql.org
>> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Site way slow, please check
>>
>> Sorry, am confusd ... what are y'all looking at? Oh hadn't
>> noticed the
>> subdirectories before ... I know several ppl still stuck in
>> 7.3 land, and
>> with stuff like Slony requiring a source download, having it there, I
>> would think, shouldn't be a problem ...
>
> Hmm, looking more closely, it seems there's only a few things that could
> probably go - 7.2.x, CVSUP and NT_Support_Files for example.
>
> However, how much load does this take (I got varying reports from none
> to loads on IRC)? Perhaps we should scrounge another server and offload
> all the bt stuff?
You are probably running a tracker, I haven't run one but I do know about
the seeding resource usage. Seeders use one bittorrent process per seed,
and those are the machines where bt puts load on.
I think we should bt every single release and list it on that bt page..
It's easier to maintain, and the seeders can start torrent seeds according
to their resources.