Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@oryx.com> writes:
> At 2006-09-05 16:35:49 -0400, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
>> So basically I don't see the point of investing effort in a
>> bug-compatible version of userlocks, when we can have something
>> cleaner and suitable for the long run with not very much more
>> effort.
> Fine with me. Two questions:
> - Where would the code live, if it were in core?
> - Shall I hack up the API you suggested in your earlier message?
Is this going anywhere? The days grow short ...
regards, tom lane