Re: [RFC] Should smgrtruncate() avoid sending sinval message for temp relations

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [RFC] Should smgrtruncate() avoid sending sinval message for temp relations
Дата
Msg-id 3257.1407863515@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [RFC] Should smgrtruncate() avoid sending sinval message for temp relations  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [RFC] Should smgrtruncate() avoid sending sinval message for temp relations  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2014-08-12 11:56:41 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Yes.  Do you have a back-patchable solution for that?

> The easiest thing I can think of is sprinkling a few
> SetConfigOption('synchronous_commit', 'off',
>                 PGC_INTERNAL, PGC_S_OVERRIDE,
>                 GUC_ACTION_LOCAL, true, ERROR);

This still seems to me to be applying a band-aid that covers over some
symptoms; it's not dealing with the root cause that we've overloaded
the signal handling mechanism too much.   What reason is there to think
that there are no other symptoms of that?
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL 9.4 mmap(2) performance regression on FreeBSD...
Следующее
От: Fabien COELHO
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PL/PgSQL: RAISE and the number of parameters