Re: Should pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend_fsync be removed?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Should pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend_fsync be removed?
Дата
Msg-id 32548.1398572185@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Should pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend_fsync be removed?  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Ответы Re: Should pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend_fsync be removed?  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> writes:
> Backend fsyncs are theoretically still possible after the fsync
> request queue compaction patch (which was subsequently back-patched to
> all supported release branches). However, I'm reasonably confident
> that that patch was so effective as to make a backend fsync all but
> impossible.

What's your evidence for that claim?
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hashable custom types
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Should pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend_fsync be removed?