"Alon Goldshuv" <agoldshuv@greenplum.com> writes:
> A struct "bytebuffer" is used instead of a StringInfoData for storing the
> line and attributes. A StringInfoData is actually really cool and useful,
> but we don't really need it's formatting capabilities in COPY FROM (as far
> as I know), and so the bytebuffer is more straightfoward and faster.
Is it really faster than appendStringInfoString or
appendBinaryStringInfo?
regards, tom lane