Re: We're not lax enough about maximum time zone offset from UTC

On May 30, 2012, at 3:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> However, as pointed out by Patric, if you dump and restore an old
> timestamptz value in one of these zones, it will fail to restore because
> of the sanity check.  I think therefore that we'd better enlarge the
> allowed range to 15:59:59 either way.

Should you be validating them on a per-time zone basis? Or does it matter?

David