Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2018-01-02 22:44:04 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Looks like we'd better rename our function. Anybody have an idea
>> more creative than "pg_copy_file_range"?
> I'd rather name it pg_rewind specific,
OK ...
> something like
> rwnd_copy_file_range or such.
Bleah --- "rwnd" is unpronounceable and not an abbreviation we're
currently using anywhere. If we go that way, let's brave carpal tunnel
syndrome by calling it "rewind_copy_file_range". But I'm not that
happy with any of these.
Filipe Rosset pointed out to me off-list that we're not the only
ones feeling the pain:
https://sourceforge.net/p/e2fsprogs/code/ci/01551bdba16ab16512a01affe02ade32c41ede8a
Maybe go with copy_file_chunk like e2fsprogs did?
regards, tom lane