Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org> writes:
> Yes, the idea had come up at some point during the review discussion. I
> agree that it's only worthwhile if it works for state type internal - though
> I think there ought to be a way to allow that. We could for example simply
> decree that the initfunc's first parameter must be of type internal if it's
> return type is, and then just pass NULL for that parameter.
I had thought about that, but it doesn't really work since it'd be
violating the strictness spec of the function.
regards, tom lane