On 4/7/24 22:35, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 4/7/24 14:37, David Rowley wrote:
>> On Sun, 7 Apr 2024 at 22:05, John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 7:37 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>> I'm planning on pushing these, pending a final look at 0002 and 0003
>>>> on Sunday morning NZ time (UTC+12), likely in about 10 hours time.
>>>
>>> +1
>>
>> I've now pushed all 3 patches. Thank you for all the reviews on
>> these and for the extra MemoryContextMethodID bit, Matthias.
>>
>>> I haven't looked at v6, but I've tried using it in situ, and it seems
>>> to work as well as hoped:
>>>
>>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CANWCAZZQFfxvzO8yZHFWtQV%2BZ2gAMv1ku16Vu7KWmb5kZQyd1w%40mail.gmail.com
>>
>> I'm already impressed with the radix tree work. Nice to see bump
>> allowing a little more memory to be saved for TID storage.
>>
>> David
>
> There seems to be some issue with this on 32-bit machines. A couple
> animals (grison, mamba) already complained about an assert int
> BumpCheck() during initdb, I get the same crash on my rpi5 running
> 32-bit debian - see the backtrace attached.
>
> I haven't investigated, but I'd considering it works on 64-bit, I guess
> it's not considering alignment somewhere. I can dig more if needed.
>
I did try running it under valgrind, and there doesn't seem to be
anything particularly wrong - just a bit of noise about calculating CRC
on uninitialized bytes.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company