Re: [HACKERS] objsubid vs subobjid
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] objsubid vs subobjid |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 31a88eb0-8ef7-e1e7-affe-daecb50aee32@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] objsubid vs subobjid (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] objsubid vs subobjid
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/1/17 09:51, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On 2/22/17 19:35, Jim Nasby wrote: >>> pg_get_object_address() currently returns a field called subobjid, while >>> pg_depend calls that objsubid. I'm guessing that wasn't on purpose >>> (especially because internally the function uses objsubid), and it'd be >>> nice to fix it. >> >> I'm in favor of changing it, but it could theoretically break someone's >> code. > > Yes, it was an oversight. +1 for changing. OK done. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: