Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> I found a few lines we could just delete in master. I wonder if we
> should also just require sizeof(bool) == 1 more explicitly going
> forward with an error, since we don't have coverage or any expectation
> of ever getting any for the alternative code AFAICS, even if it is
> small.
Yeah, that's a fair criticism. I don't think we've tested that code
path since I retired prairiedog, so who's to say that it works even
now? Maybe it's best to just delete that code, and if we ever find a
new platform with wider bool, figure out what to do at that time.
regards, tom lane