Re: Corruption during WAL replay

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> The only thing I can really conclude here is that we apparently end up with
> the same checksum for exactly the modifications we are doing? Just on those
> two damn instances? Reliably?

IIRC, the table's OID or relfilenode enters into the checksum.
Could it be that assigning a specific OID to the table allows
this to happen, and these two animals are somehow assigning
that OID while others are using some slightly different OID?

            regards, tom lane