Re: BUG #10329: Could not read block 0 in file "base/56100265/57047884": read only 0 of 8192 bytes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: BUG #10329: Could not read block 0 in file "base/56100265/57047884": read only 0 of 8192 bytes
Дата
Msg-id 31813.1400181933@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #10329: Could not read block 0 in file "base/56100265/57047884": read only 0 of 8192 bytes  (Olivier Macchioni <olivier.macchioni@wingo.ch>)
Ответы Re: BUG #10329: Could not read block 0 in file "base/56100265/57047884": read only 0 of 8192 bytes
Список pgsql-bugs
Olivier Macchioni <olivier.macchioni@wingo.ch> writes:
> - I assume there is a usage for hash indexes and we don't simply want to deprecate them

There's a school of thought that says we *should* deprecate them as
long as we don't have WAL support, but that viewpoint is not universally
subscribed to.

One of the arguments against Bruce's proposal to print a warning at hash
index creation is that it's a particularly ineffective form of
deprecation.  In your example, since the hash index was created by some
app not manually, I'll bet nobody would have seen/noticed the warning
even if there had been one.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Olivier Macchioni
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #10329: Could not read block 0 in file "base/56100265/57047884": read only 0 of 8192 bytes
Следующее
От: David G Johnston
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #10329: Could not read block 0 in file "base/56100265/57047884": read only 0 of 8192 bytes