Re: Refactoring the API for amgetmulti
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: Refactoring the API for amgetmulti
Дата
Msg-id
3174.1153929592@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Re: Refactoring the API for amgetmulti (Martijn van Oosterhout)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Refactoring the API for amgetmulti Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Refactoring the API for amgetmulti Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Refactoring the API for amgetmulti Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>
Re: Refactoring the API for amgetmulti Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Refactoring the API for amgetmulti Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>
Re: Refactoring the API for amgetmulti Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Martijn van Oosterhout writes: > I've considered whether it's worthwhile going to other way: getting the > IndexScan executer node to uses getmulti to reduce index AM overhead. > But that requires backward scan support also... I think Heikki got most of the low-hanging fruit already with that patch for page-at-a-time scanning in btree. There's some wasted overhead just from multiple levels of function call, but I doubt it's really a big deal anymore. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления