Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster
Дата
Msg-id 31709.1487599811@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster  (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> It's definitely not hard, we already have
> IntegerTimestampToTimestampTz() which does the opposite conversion anyway.

It's not the functions that are hard, it's making sure that you have used
them in the correct places, and declared relevant variables with the
appropriate types.  Evidence on the ground is that that is very hard;
I have little faith that we'll get it right without compiler support.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster
Следующее
От: Aleksander Alekseev
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Suppress Clang 3.9 warnings