Re: MemSet inline for newNode
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: MemSet inline for newNode |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3167.1037038110@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: MemSet inline for newNode (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: MemSet inline for newNode
|
| Список | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I can't do MemSet in a macro that returns a value, as palloc requires.
> MemSet has a loop, and that can't be done in a macro that returns a value.
Hm. How did Neil test this originally --- was he relying on being able
to "inline" newNode()?
Anyway, I don't think that passing an extra parameter can be a win.
If there has to be a runtime test, testing whether the two low bits
of the length are zero is probably about the same speed as testing a
boolean parameter. It's unlikely to be enough slower to justify the
cost of passing another parameter.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: