Re: [PATCH] Renumber confusing value for GUC_UNIT_BYTE

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [PATCH] Renumber confusing value for GUC_UNIT_BYTE
Дата
Msg-id 316575e0-64b8-3db6-865c-165b94958ce0@enterprisedb.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] Renumber confusing value for GUC_UNIT_BYTE  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 06.09.22 08:27, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 01:57:53AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>>> I think renumbering this makes sense.  We could just leave the comment
>>> as is if we don't come up with a better wording.
>>
>> +1, I see no need to change the comment.  We just need to establish
>> the precedent that values within the GUC_UNIT_MEMORY field can be
>> chosen sequentially.
> 
> +1.

committed without the comment change

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Drouvot, Bertrand"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Patch to address creation of PgStat* contexts with null parent context
Следующее
От: Christoph Berg
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [postgis-devel] PostGIS and json_categorize_type (Re: pgsql: Revert SQL/JSON features)