Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3157.1362940373@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables (Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>) |
| Ответы |
postgres_fdw vs data formatting GUCs (was Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables)
Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> writes:
> [ pgsql-v9.3-writable-fdw-poc.v12.part-1/2.patch ]
Applied after rather extensive editorialization. DELETE RETURNING in
particular was a mess, and I also tried to make SELECT FOR UPDATE behave
in what seemed like a sane fashion.
There's a lot left to do here of course. One thing I was wondering
about was why we don't allow DEFAULTs to be attached to foreign-table
columns. There was no use in it before, but it seems sensible enough
now.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: