Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type?
Дата
Msg-id 31523.1392822224@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> GET_8_BYTES only exists for 64bit systems.

> Right, I got that far.  So it looks like float8, int8, timestamp,
> timestamptz, and money all have behavior contingent on
> USE_FLOAT8_BYVAL, making that symbol a misnomer in every way.  But
> since we've already marched pretty far down that path I suppose we
> should keep marching.

You need somebody to help you with getting that working on 32-bit
platforms?  Because it needs to get fixed, or reverted, PDQ.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: GiST support for inet datatypes
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type?