Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Now that I re-read this complaint once again, I wonder if a mismatching
> column order in partitions isn't a thing we ought to preserve anyhow.
> Robert, Amit -- is it by design that pg_dump loses the original column
> order for partitions, when not in binary-upgrade mode?
I haven't looked at the partitioning code, but I am quite sure that that's
always happened for old-style inheritance children, and I imagine pg_dump
is just duplicating that old behavior.
Wasn't there already a patch on the table to change this, though,
by removing the code path that uses inheritance rather than the
binary-upgrade-like solution?
regards, tom lane