Re: Add PGDLLEXPORT to PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1

Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm okay with adding PGDLLEXPORT to the extern, but we should update
>> that comment to note that it's not necessary with any of our standard
>> Windows build processes.  (For that matter, the comment fails to explain
>> why this macro is providing an extern for the base function at all...)

> Here is a patch for that, including an attempt to improve the comment.

Pushed with some further twiddling of the comment.
        regards, tom lane