Re: [BUGS] BUG #14808: V10-beta4, backend abort
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14808: V10-beta4, backend abort |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 31365.1505342642@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14808: V10-beta4, backend abort (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14808: V10-beta4, backend abort
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> writes: > Aside from the RI case, the other user visible change in behaviour > will be for statements that update the same table via multiple > ModifyTable nodes (wCTEs). Our regression test has: > with wcte as (insert into table1 values (42)) > insert into table2 values ('hello world'); > ... which demonstrates the fix for the original complaint that table1 > and table2 earlier tried to use the same transition table (and > crashed). BTW, as I'm digging around in trigger.c, I can't help noticing that it provides a single "fdw_tuplestore" per trigger query level (a/k/a trigger execution context). I've not tried to test this, but it sure looks like a wCTE like your example above, directed at two separate foreign tables with triggers, would fail for exactly the same reason. That'd be a bug of pretty long standing. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: