Re: lwlocknames.h beautification attempt
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: lwlocknames.h beautification attempt |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3128012.1740896767@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | lwlocknames.h beautification attempt (Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im>) |
| Ответы |
Re: lwlocknames.h beautification attempt
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im> writes:
> I propose the following change to the generation script,
> generate-lwlocknames.pl
> ...
> which produces the lock names in this format
> #define ShmemIndexLock (&MainLWLockArray[1].lock)
> #define OidGenLock (&MainLWLockArray[2].lock)
> #define XidGenLock (&MainLWLockArray[3].lock)
> #define ProcArrayLock (&MainLWLockArray[4].lock)
> #define SInvalReadLock (&MainLWLockArray[5].lock)
This looks reasonably in line with project style ...
> Yet another format, which I prefer, can be achieved by right-aligning the
> lock names.
> #define ShmemIndexLock (&MainLWLockArray[1].lock)
> #define OidGenLock (&MainLWLockArray[2].lock)
> #define XidGenLock (&MainLWLockArray[3].lock)
> #define ProcArrayLock (&MainLWLockArray[4].lock)
> #define SInvalReadLock (&MainLWLockArray[5].lock)
... but that doesn't. I challenge you to provide even one example
of that layout in our source tree, or to explain why it's better.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: