Re: lwlocknames.h beautification attempt
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: lwlocknames.h beautification attempt |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3128012.1740896767@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | lwlocknames.h beautification attempt (Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im>) |
Ответы |
Re: lwlocknames.h beautification attempt
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im> writes: > I propose the following change to the generation script, > generate-lwlocknames.pl > ... > which produces the lock names in this format > #define ShmemIndexLock (&MainLWLockArray[1].lock) > #define OidGenLock (&MainLWLockArray[2].lock) > #define XidGenLock (&MainLWLockArray[3].lock) > #define ProcArrayLock (&MainLWLockArray[4].lock) > #define SInvalReadLock (&MainLWLockArray[5].lock) This looks reasonably in line with project style ... > Yet another format, which I prefer, can be achieved by right-aligning the > lock names. > #define ShmemIndexLock (&MainLWLockArray[1].lock) > #define OidGenLock (&MainLWLockArray[2].lock) > #define XidGenLock (&MainLWLockArray[3].lock) > #define ProcArrayLock (&MainLWLockArray[4].lock) > #define SInvalReadLock (&MainLWLockArray[5].lock) ... but that doesn't. I challenge you to provide even one example of that layout in our source tree, or to explain why it's better. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: