Re: A doubt w.r.t WAL

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: A doubt w.r.t WAL
Дата
Msg-id 3124.1058847228@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на A doubt w.r.t WAL  (Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>)
Ответы Re: A doubt w.r.t WAL  (Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh@pop.jaring.my>)
Список pgsql-general
Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in> writes:
> Let's say I have only one wAL segment of 16MB and in a single transaction I
> put 20MB of data, say a text file dump inside a transaction.

AFAIR you cannot force the system to have only one WAL segment; it
*will* make another one when it has to.

Once it has established a checkpoint within the current WAL segment,
it is able to delete the previous segment, and will do so if you've
set the WAL parameters that small.  I don't really recommend doing
so however.  Creating and deleting WAL segments is expensive, and not
very productive compared to recycling them.  The out-of-the-box
settings allow the system to recycle three or so WAL segments.
Unless you're truly desperate for disk space you should not reduce
the default WAL settings.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Raymond
Дата:
Сообщение: Tables, Views and Rules
Следующее
От: "Abhishek Goyal"
Дата:
Сообщение: Postgres Database Error Codes and Error Messages