Re: Understanding Postgres Memory Usage

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Understanding Postgres Memory Usage
Дата
Msg-id 31126.1472171240@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Understanding Postgres Memory Usage  (Theron Luhn <theron@luhn.com>)
Ответы Re: Understanding Postgres Memory Usage  (Theron Luhn <theron@luhn.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Theron Luhn <theron@luhn.com> writes:
> Okay, here's the output:
> https://gist.github.com/luhn/a39db625ba5eed90946dd4a196d12220

Hm, well the only thing there that looks even slightly out of the
ordinary is the amount of free space in TopMemoryContext itself:

TopMemoryContext: 3525712 total in 432 blocks; 3444272 free (12654 chunks); 81440 used

Normally, TopMemoryContext doesn't get to more than a few hundred K,
and in the cases I've seen where it does, it's usually been because of
leaky coding that was allocating stuff there and never cleaning it up.
But you've got no more than the typical amount of space still allocated
there, which seems to kill the "leak in TopMemoryContext" theory.
And in any case there is nowhere near 100MB accounted for by the whole
dump.

Are you using any other PLs besides plpgsql?  We've seen cases where
bloat occurred within plpython or plperl, and wasn't visible in this
dump because those languages don't use PG's memory management code.
Or maybe some nonstandard extension?

If not that, then I'd have to speculate that the query you're running is
triggering some bug or otherwise pathological behavior.  Can you put
together a self-contained test case?

            regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ahsan Ali
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: LOG: could not fork new process for connection: Cannot allocate memory
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: incorrect checksum detected on "global/pg_filenode.map" when VACUUM FULL is executed