Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3103.1313420035@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 16:20, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> However, for a narrow fix, I could see moving the data type definition
>> to someplace with fewer dependencies. �Perhaps split it into a separate
>> file timestamp_type.h, or something like that.
> Yes, that seems to fix the problem of timestamptz. See the attached
> patch - seems ok?
Don't think you should expose fsec_t, nor most of those macros. The
foo_per_bar values are just namespace clutter.
> I also ran into a similar problem with some WAL macro definitions that
> are in xlog_internal.h. I've moved them to xlogdefs.h in the attached
> xlog.diff file. Does that seem ok as well, or should I move them
> somewhere else?
I don't like the idea of exposing those to frontends, either. What do
you actually *need* out of that, and why?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: