Re: [HACKERS] Incomplete startup packet errors

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Incomplete startup packet errors
Дата
Msg-id 3102.1551497150@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Incomplete startup packet errors  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Incomplete startup packet errors
Список pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 3/1/19 6:49 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> No patch referenced, but I assume you mean only for the
>> zero-bytes-received case, right?  No objection if so.

> Patch proposed by Christoph Berg is here:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20190228151336.GB7550%40msg.df7cb.de

Meh.  That doesn't silence only the zero-bytes case, and I'm also
rather afraid of the fact that it's changing COMMERROR to something
else.  I wonder whether (if client_min_messages <= DEBUG1) it could
result in trying to send the error message to the already-lost
connection.  It might be that that can't happen, but I think a fair
amount of rather subtle (and breakable) analysis may be needed.

            regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Incomplete startup packet errors
Следующее
От: Shawn Debnath
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue