Re: Problems with plan estimates in postgres_fdw

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Antonin Houska
Тема Re: Problems with plan estimates in postgres_fdw
Дата
Msg-id 30939.1550848901@localhost
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Problems with plan estimates in postgres_fdw  (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: Problems with plan estimates in postgres_fdw  (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:

> (2019/02/08 21:35), Etsuro Fujita wrote:

> > (2019/02/08 2:04), Antonin Houska wrote:

> >> * regression tests: I think test(s) should be added for queries that have
> >> ORDER BY clause but do not have GROUP BY (and also no LIMIT / OFFSET)
> >> clause. I haven't noticed such tests.
> >
> > Will do.
> 
> I noticed that such queries would be processed by what we already have for
> sort pushdown (ie, add_paths_with_pathkeys_for_rel()).  I might be missing
> something, though.

What about an ORDER BY expression that contains multiple Var nodes? For
example

SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY x + y;

I think the base relation should not be able to generate paths with the
corresponding pathkeys, since its target should (besides PlaceHolderVars,
which should not appear in the plan of this simple query at all) only emit
individual Vars.

-- 
Antonin Houska
https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Euler Taveira
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: psql show URL with help
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: boolean and bool in documentation