[ I'm so far behind ... ]
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Applied. Thank you for all your suggestions.
I thought the suggestion had been to issue a *warning*. How did that
become an error? This patch seems likely to break applications that
may have just been harmlessly sloppy about when they were issuing
SETs and/or what flavor of SET they use. We don't for example throw
an error for START TRANSACTION with an open transaction or COMMIT or
ROLLBACK without one --- how can it possibly be argued that these
operations are more dangerous than those cases?
I'd personally have voted for using NOTICE.
regards, tom lane