Re: ISN extension - wrong volatility level for isn_weak() function

Viktor Holmberg <v@viktorh.net> writes:
> However, cleaning things up to use GUC seems like it’d be bigger task, and also would only be an extra thing, as
isn_weakfunction would need to stay in for backwards compatibility I assume. 

Wouldn't be a big deal --- yes, accept_weak_input would need a bit of
modification, but it's not much.  The main reason I suggested it was
that a GUC would be subject to RESET ALL and so it'd fix the pooler
hazard you pointed out.

> In terms of just fixing the immediate bug, I believe it’d just be to change isn.sql line 3423 and 2433:

No, we'd need to create an update script that uses ALTER FUNCTION.
Extension scripts are basically frozen once shipped.

            regards, tom lane