Re: Statistics Import and Export
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Statistics Import and Export |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3071639.1740864219@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Statistics Import and Export (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Statistics Import and Export
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes: > On Sat, 2025-03-01 at 13:52 -0500, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: >> Also, anything trained to parse pg_dump output will have to learn >> about the new SELECT pg_restore_ calls with their multi-line formats >> (not 100% sure we don't have that anywhere, as things like "SELECT >> setval" and "SELECT set_config" are single line, but there may be >> existing things) > That's an interesting point. What tools are currrently trying to parse > pg_dump output? That particular argument needs to be rejected vociferously. Otherwise we could never make any change at all in what pg_dump emits. I think the standard has to be "if you parse pg_dump output, it's on you to cope with any legal SQL". I do grasp Greg's larger point that this is a big change in pg_dump's behavior and will certainly break some expectations. I kind of lean to the position that we'll be sad in the long run if we don't change the default, though. What other part of pg_dump's output is not produced by default? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: