Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:39:07PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah, I see nothing about 3f902354b in release-10.sgml either.
>> We've had varying policies over the years about whether to mention
>> internal API changes in the release notes or not, but this one
>> I think does belong there, since it's a silent API break rather
>> than one that would easily be caught due to compiler errors.
>> Bruce, did you have any specific reasoning for leaving it out?
> I doubt I saw that sentence in the paragraph. For long text like that,
> I am usually looking for "BACKWARDS INCOMPATIBLE CHANGE" or something
> like that. Sorry I missed it.
I added something about this to the notes.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers