Re: BUG #17351: Altering a composite type created for a partitioned table can lead to a crash
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #17351: Altering a composite type created for a partitioned table can lead to a crash |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3057471.1641072425@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | BUG #17351: Altering a composite type created for a partitioned table can lead to a crash (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: BUG #17351: Altering a composite type created for a partitioned table can lead to a crash
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> When executing the following queries:
> create table pt (a int, b int) partition by list (b);
> create table t(a pt, check (a = '(1, 2)'::pt));
> alter table pt alter column a type char(4);
> \d+ t
> The server crashes with the following stack:
Hmm. We really ought to reject the ALTER TABLE. We do if "pt"
is a plain table:
regression=# create table pt (a int, b int);
CREATE TABLE
regression=# create table t(a pt);
CREATE TABLE
regression=# alter table pt alter column a type char(4);
ERROR: cannot alter table "pt" because column "t.a" uses its row type
So something is mistakenly skipping that check for partitioned
tables.
I think we're also failing to worry about the rowtype of the
constant in t's check constraint; it seems like that has to
be complained of as well, even if the underyling columns
aren't of type "pt".
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: