Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Merlin Moncure
Тема Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code
Дата
Msg-id 303E00EBDD07B943924382E153890E5434AA0E@cuthbert.rcsinc.local
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers-win32
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> So, by my logic, if we have 100 backends all doing updates, we will
need
> 10 * 100 or 1000 writer processes or threads to keep up with that
load.
> That seems quite excessive to me from a context switching and process
> overhead perspective.

Quick point:
A single process using multiple threads dedicated to writing is an
excellent optimization target on the win32 platform, (and if it is
similarly useful on other platforms, so much the better).  To my way of
thinking, this is an ideal approach in the long run.

Multiple processes scheduling writes (even it is only 10), IMO, is a bad
idea because of the way process management on win32 works for various
reasons.

Merlin


В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Win32 pg_ctl
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code