Re: [HACKERS] TAP backpatching policy

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] TAP backpatching policy
Дата
Msg-id 30214.1496250801@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] TAP backpatching policy  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] TAP backpatching policy  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Re: [HACKERS] TAP backpatching policy  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> My main concern is how widely is the buildfarm going to test the new
> test frameworks.  If we backpatch PostgresNode-based tests to 9.2, are
> buildfarm animals going to need to be reconfigured to use
> --enable-tap-tests?

Yes.  The animals that are doing it at all are using code more or less
like this:

if ($branch eq 'HEAD' or $branch ge 'REL9_4')
{   push(@{$conf{config_opts}},"--enable-tap-tests");
}

(verbatim from longfin's config script)

So maybe that's an argument for not going back before 9.4.  OTOH,
you may be giving the buildfarm owners too little credit for
willingness to update their configurations.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] relocation truncated to fit: citus build failure on s390x
Следующее
От: Dilip Kumar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] <> join selectivity estimate question