Re: Pasword expiration warning

Le 08/01/2026 à 08:43, Japin Li a écrit :
> On Thu, 08 Jan 2026 at 07:04, Gilles Darold <gilles@darold.net> wrote:
>> Le 08/01/2026 à 04:37, Japin Li a écrit :
>>> On Thu, 08 Jan 2026 at 10:57, "songjinzhou" <tsinghualucky912@foxmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi, Gilles Darold
>>>>
>>>> First of all, thank you for your reply. This is indeed not a simple
>>>> countdown. I did think it would be abrupt for users to see "0 days". I
>>>> checked v4, and I think it's fine. (PS: Should we add relevant
>>>> explanations to the SGML?) Thank you.
>>>>     
>>> I'd like to hear more opinions on this.
>>>
>> Here is a new version of the patch that adds the documentation for the
>> new GUC, fix the warning message (days(s) instead of days) and handle
>> the 'Infinity' value for the VALID UNTIL clause.
>>
>>
> Thanks for updating the patch.
>
> 1.
> I noticed a warning when applying the patch.
>
> Applying: Add password_expire_warning GUC to warn clients
> .git/rebase-apply/patch:31: trailing whitespace.
>          disable this behavior. The default value is <literal>7d</literal>.
> warning: 1 line adds whitespace errors.
>
> 2.
>        <varlistentry id="guc-password-encryption" xreflabel="password_encryption">
> -      <term><varname>password_encryption</varname> (<type>enum</type>)
> +      <term><varname>password_encryption</varname> (<type>enum</type>
> +)
>
> I think this modification isn't necessary.
>
> 3.
> +        float8          result;
> +
> +        result = ((float8) (vuntil - GetCurrentTimestamp())) / 1000000.0; /* in seconds */
> +
>
> Perhaps we could use TimestampTz for the result variable and substitute
> USECS_PER_SEC for 1000000.0—that would avoid the unnecessary type cast.
>
> 4.
> +        if ((int) result <= password_expire_warning)
>
> If the result exceeds INT_MAX, it triggers undefined behavior (IIRC).
> Therefore, we should probably cast password_expire_warning itself.
>
> 5.
> With this feature, GetCurrentTimestamp() might end up being called twice.
> Perhaps we can avoid that duplication.
>
>
> Attached is v6 of the patch addressing the issues above. Please take a look.


Thanks Japin, the implementation is fully working using the TimestampTz 
cast.


I've attached a new patch to fix documentation and comments reported by 
liu xiaohui and create a commitfest entry : 
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/6381/ Every one involved in the 
review should edit the commitfest entry.


-- 
Gilles Darold
http://hexacluster.ai/