Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with --disable-integer-datetimes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with --disable-integer-datetimes
Дата
Msg-id 30007.1487374499@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with --disable-integer-datetimes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> Right now I'd rather focus on getting to where we can have -Werror on in
> the buildfarm at all.  longfin says we've got work to do on that, at least
> in the back branches.  It may be that we can't expect near-EOL branches to
> always compile perfectly cleanly on newer compilers.

I found that longfin's compiler is happy with 9.4 and up as-is, and it
required only a few very small and safe back-patches to make 9.3 work
too.  However, it's looking like -Werror with 9.2 is a bridge too far.
The thing that seems untenable is that to make 9.2 compile clean, we would
have to back-patch commit 71450d7fd, along with a fair amount of follow-on
work, so that the compiler would understand that ereport(ERROR) doesn't
return.  I don't think we want to go that far --- and maybe introduce
portability issues for someone's ancient compiler --- for a branch that's
near EOL anyway.

I'll adjust longfin's configuration so that it only applies -Werror in
9.3 and up.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] logical replication access control patches
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] pg_recvlogical.c doesn't build with--disable-integer-datetimes