Re: [HACKERS] ordering RH6.1
От | Frans Van Elsacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] ordering RH6.1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.6.32.19991216235345.00886530@193.75.233.1 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] ordering RH6.1 (Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I download all the rpm from (http://www.ramifordistat.net/postgres/RPMS/redhat-6.x/postgresql*-2nl.i386. rpm) and have install each of them in redhat 6.1. But we received the same bad results as before. - my redhat was downloaded from a mirror site as a cd-image- and there where some older version of postgres (v 6.5.2-1) installedon our test system before. They were first uninstalled. This are the only two packages that we have running on our machine. I've choose the half-automatic graphic install of redhat. Selected some standard tools like ftp, network tool,... and choose a belgian keyboard. I have left the timezone selection as default. Strange things! I see only the following posibilities : - Our redhat cd-image is different from yours (Why ??) - influence of the olderversions - keyboard settings ??? This is our result : [postgres@dekatest pgsql]$ psql test Welcome to the POSTGRESQL interactive sql monitor: Please read the file COPYRIGHT for copyright terms of POSTGRESQL [PostgreSQL 6.5.3 on i586-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc egcs-2.91.66] type \? for help on slash commands type \q to quit type \g or terminate with semicolon to execute queryYou are currentlyconnected to the database: test test=> CREATE TABLE BLANK (column1 varchar(5)); CREATE test=> INSERT INTO BLANK (column1) VALUES (' 1'); INSERT 587145 1 test=> INSERT INTO BLANK (column1) VALUES (' 11'); INSERT 587146 1 test=> INSERT INTO BLANK (column1) VALUES (' 100'); INSERT 587147 1 test=> INSERT INTO BLANK (column1) VALUES (' 2'); INSERT 587148 1 test=> SELECT * FROM BLANK order by column1; column1 ------- 1 100 11 2 (4 rows) Any Idea ? greetings, Frans At 10:55 15/12/99 -0500, you wrote: >Tom Lane wrote: > >> I wonder if this could be a LOCALE or MULTIBYTE issue. Do you have >> either feature enabled in your copy, and if so what locale/encoding >> do you use? (I'm running plain vanilla no-USE_LOCALE, no-MULTIBYTE >> code, so that might be why I don't see anything funny...) > >He's running the RPM distribution, which at that release has >--enable-locale but no multibyte. > >Using the no-locale RPM's I last built, I can't reproduce his results. > >Frans, try out the no-locale rpm set and see if the result changes, if >you please. (using wget, you would do: wget >http://www.ramifordistat.net/postgres/RPMS/redhat-6.x/postgresql*-2nl.i386. rpm >) > >This will verify whether it is locale-related or not. I would install >the locale RPMs and test for you right now, but my 6.1 machine is at >home. If it is inconvenient for you to download this, let me know, and >I'll try to test tonight at home -- although, I've been meaning to do >just that for nearly a week now, but I haven't even fired up the machine >at home in the last week. > >-- >Lamar Owen >WGCR Internet Radio >1 Peter 4:11 > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: