At 11:27 11/07/00 +1000, Chris Bitmead wrote:
>
>> It was mentioned here that triggers could be used for async replication,
>> as well as WAL.
>
>Same story. Major inefficency. Replication is tough enough without
>mucking
>around with triggers. Once the trigger executes you've got to go and
>store
>the data in the database again anyway. Then figure out when to delete
>it.
>
The WAL *should* be the most efficient technique for replication (this said
without actually having seen it ;-}).
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.C.N. 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \| | --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/