At 11:00 PM 12/2/00 -0800, Vadim Mikheev wrote:
>> There is risk here. It isn't so much in the fact that PostgreSQL, Inc
>> is doing a couple of modest closed-source things with the code. After
>> all, the PG community has long acknowleged that the BSD license would
>> allow others to co-op the code and commercialize it with no obligations.
>>
>> It is rather sad to see PG, Inc. take the first step in this direction.
>>
>> How long until the entire code base gets co-opted?
>
>I totaly missed your point here. How closing source of ERserver is related
>to closing code of PostgreSQL DB server? Let me clear things:
(not based on WAL)
That's wasn't clear from the blurb.
Still, this notion that PG, Inc will start producing closed-source products
poisons the well. It strengthens FUD arguments of the "open source can't
provide enterprise solutions" variety. "Look, even PostgreSQL, Inc realizes
that you must follow a close sourced model in order to provide tools for
the corporate world."
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert
Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.